Skype may have announced free calls to all US/Canadian registered landlines and mobile phones… but it only applies if you’re also calling from US or Canada.
By introducing this limitation they’re actually fucking those of us not living in North America twice!
You see, the only difference between me calling a given US landline from London, and someone else calling the same US landline from New York is that my call has to go some extra distance in the IP network. But that’s the bit that’s FREE!
So that’s me fucked over #1
But then when I do start talking to my friend on the landline, I’m still getting charged the same “SkypeOut” rate that I always have been (SkypeOut is the cost for routing the call onto the traditional PTSN phone network).
Well, clearly Skype have negotiated a vastly discounted (or free) deal with a national PTSN carrier to make their “free calls” announcement viable. So when I make my landline call now Skype are making an even bigger profit because I’m not seeing any reduction in my call charge!
That’s me fucked over #2!
So, economics (or just money moans aside) it got me thinking. Doesn’t this caveat completely turn it’s back on the “power of the network” – he very concept Skype was based upon?
The whole point of VoIP is that geography doesn’t matter – you don’t need to know or care where you are calling from, or where you are calling to.
Well, that combined with the fact that IP-to-IP calls costs nothing to serve, and that you only need to start paying when you need to use a PTSN node to route your call the traditional phone system.
Suddenly that’s all changed. Geography now does matter (again?). And something that is free (the IP-to-IP portion of the call) is now having an indirect charge placed upon it for certain customers in certain circumstances.
Clearly the “North-American callers only” caveat is not a technical issue, it’s a matter of economics. But equally, why do I want to be treated like a second-class customer?
There’s plenty of other VoIP provides out there to furnish with my business.
and what about skype through proxy in US? 🙂 – http://magazine.olrin.org/skype-through-proxy-server-in-us/
Sounds almost like those supposedly cheap download websites like itunes.. that cost more than buying an album, even though the website is barely paying anything like the same distribution costs, and no packaging costs etc.
Just someone getting greedy in both cases…
Peter, the odd thing is the way that Skype works is that it routes your call through several proxies.
So if you call the US your call is probably routed by a US-based intermediatry proxy.
So the absolute fine different between the free and non-free offer is whether the call originated at that proxy or was received by that proxy from abroad.
C’mon, there is no reason why it would cost Skype anymore to serve that call in the above example.
That’s why I’m pissed off.
If someone can make it look like the call originated at that US proxy (and thus gain free calls) then I guess it might work. But:
a) Skype is a closed, proprietary protocol. It would be hard to intercept this at the protocol level, and to do so may infringe Skype’s rights.
b) It would be so much more easier and logical if Skype just made this available to everyone.
Thats the hidden cliche. Skype routes through various proxies, hence you are charged! Skype needs to survive too.
you are such a good writer