Skip to content →

The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe

I would like to warn current and future owners of .ly domains of a concerning incident regarding the deletion of one of our prime domains ‘vb.ly’ by NIC.ly (the domain registry and controlling body for the Libyan domain space ‘.ly’).

In short:

The domain was seized by the Libyan domain registry for reasons which seemed to be kept obscure until we escalated the issue. We eventually discovered that the domain has been seized because the content of our website, in their opinion, fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.

This is deeply concerning for everyone, but especially .ly domain owners, because it sets a precedent that all websites running on a .ly domain must comply with Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law in order to maintain their domains. This is especially concerning for anyone running a url shortener or hosting user-generated content on a .ly domain.

You may also not know that since June 2010 .ly domains less than 4 characters long may no longer be registered by anyone who isn’t in Libya – which suggests there is tension around foreign owned, high-value, short .ly domains.

The full story:

Our domain ‘vb.ly’ (which was joint owned by myself and my partner Violet Blue) was deleted by NIC.ly without warning or notice on or around September 23rd 2010. We were subsequently told that our domain has been removed to us being “in clear violation of NIC rules and regulations” relating to “text referring to adult content and offensive imagery from [our] main page”.

The regulations for .ly domains are available at http://nic.ly/regulations.php. Aside from the fact that we contest that any adult content or offensive imagery exists on the site (vb.ly is a url shortener), what is more concerning is that there does not appear to be any regulation(s) written on that page that actually pertains to the violation notice we were given.

In other words we felt that the NIC.ly registry was claiming it has deleted our domain for infringements that do not actually form any part of their regulations.

However after numerous emails and escalating the matter to NIC.ly directly, we were told by Mr Alaeddin S. ElSharif (Web services Dept. NIC.ly/Libya Telecom and Technology):

“…clause 3.5 clearly states that: “The Applicant certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge the domain name is not being registered for any activities/purpose not permitted under Libyan law.”

Pornography and adult material aren’t allowed under Libyan Law, therefore we removed the domain…”

Again, while we contest that there was NO pornography or adult material on vb.ly, I would suggest that there is a far more concerning issue here if domain registries can decide on the validity of a domain registration based on the content of the website that uses it. I would argue that the two are extricably decoupled and separate entities.

An additional concern is that the clause being used here pertains to Libyan Islamic Law which appears impossible to find listed in English.

This incident also follows on from a significant (but sadly unreported) recent decision by NIC.ly that as of June 2010:

“.LY domains that are shorter than 4 characters are only allowed for companies or individuals having presence in Libya.” [link]

Existing owners of such domains may renew but those premium domains are no longer open for registration by anyone who does not have a presence in Libya. Think about that, the domains for bit.ly, owl.ly (another set of url shorteners) and ad.ly (advertising solution), would not be registrable now by foreigners. Previously, any domain available was available to anyone who wanted to register it.

We found this u-turn in registration policy surprising. We wonder whether having seen the ‘mini domain gold rush’ that occured with the .ly domain space, there is suddenly a desire – perhaps even pressure – to have local Libyans control some of the the most premium and valuable .ly domains.

With this already in our minds, we found the following line from the email communication we received about the deletion deeply concerning:

…your domain being removed from NIC.LY records and made available for re-registration for locals

We wonder whether this line suggests that in the back of the mind of the person deleting our domain was the motivation that a rare <4 letter .ly domain would suddenly become available for a local Libyan national to register.

I’m not against Libyans registering .ly domains; instead I suggest that NIC.ly/Libya realized too late the value of these premium domains and now there is clearly back-peddling going on to ensure they don’t all end up in the hands of non-Libyans. Further more, I wonder if there is pressure for NIC.ly to do what it can to recover premium <4 letter .ly domains where possible so that they end up back in the pool only available for locals to re-register Finally, I wonder whether NIC.ly are being pressured to go so far with this that they would even revoke domains for reasons that don’t specifically violate any of the regulations that domain owners agreed to upon registration.

.ly domain space to be considered unsafe

For these reasons I believe the .ly domains should be considered unsafe. Anyone running a business or relying on a website with a one, two or three letter .ly domain should be incredibly cautious. This obviously includes anyone who uses bit.ly, 3.ly, owl.ly and any other similar url shortener.

I cannot see how the deletion of our .ly domain couldn’t happen to the owners of these domains too. In fact bit.ly is hosting many, many links that depict the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), extreme pornographic subject matter, etc.

However, the fact that NIC.ly are asserting editorial control over the content of any website using a .ly domain is perhaps the most troubling to any .ly domain owner and indeed the internet community at large. Not only is it paramount to censorship and doesn’t reflect the decoupled nature of domains vs websites, but it sets a dangerous precedent in the space.

At the time of writing our domain vb.ly is still revoked and our website is offline.

To sum up:

  • .ly domains deemed to be in violation of NIC.ly regulation are being deregistered and removed without warning – causing significant inconvenience and damage.
  • .ly domains are being deregistered and removed due to reasons that do not correspond to the regulations defined in the official NIC.ly Regulations.
  • NIC.ly seems to want to extend their reach beyond the domain itself and regulate the content of websites that use a .ly domain. The concept amounts to censorship and makes .ly domains untenable to be used for user-generated content or url shorteners.
  • Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law is being used to consider the validity of domains, which is unclear and obscure in terms of being able to know what is allowed and what isn’t.
  • NIC.ly have suddenly decided that <4 letter .ly domains should only be available to local Libyans and this appears to create motivation to recover what premium domains they can to go back into this new local-only pot of domains.

You can read more about this, including copies of email correspondence, over at Violet Blue’s TechYum website.

UPDATE: My partner Violet Blue (former co-owner of vb.ly) has a thought provoking review of the way this story has played out across the media today. Her site is slightly NSFW.

Published in News Thoughts and Rants

213 Comments

  1. […] to one of the co-owners of vb.ly, Ben Metcalfe, the site was taken down by NIC.ly on September 23, 2010 without notice. Through email exchange, […]

  2. Don’t they say, the only safe bets for URLs is .com and .co.uk, anything else don’t touch.

    David.

  3. Metcalfe ??????????????? ??????????????????? vb.ly ???????????????

  4. […] &#1110n opposition &#959f Libya’s prevailing Islamic Sharia Law. According t&#959 Ben Metcalfe, wh&#959 owns vb.ly, Libya &#1110&#1109 &#1072&#406&#1109&#959 moving t&#959 take over […]

  5. GG GG

    well… that’s now quite easy: let’s all use the url shortener bit.ly to add some links towars porno sites. Bit.ly is the flagg ship of the lybian web (as most well known site with the ly extension).

  6. A while ago (circa 2004?) something similar happened with the .ca extension where bloggers not from canada were booted off the TLD

    I remembered it as people registered all these novel tlds.. they’re not safe.

  7. […] .ly domains are being called unsafe. Presumably bit.ly and ow.ly, both popular URL shortening services, will be just fine due to the […]

  8. Why do so many internet sites end with .ly?…

    .ly, .us and other two letter domains are, as Jamie Quint says, a way to create one-word, English language domains, since virtually all one-word dot-com domains are either in use or parked by domain name speculators. I worked at one company that had a …

  9. […] de la tele (.tv) y Libvya (.ly) que participó en el importante desarrollo de los shorturls, por más peligroso que haya sido el ecosistema (lección que nos quedó clara con […]

  10. dennis dias dennis dias

    i can see any picture and show some message that which is not opening the file
    please help me to see those picture and how to see it?
    waiting for your reply

  11. […] There’s some precedent for the fear: last October, the Libyan government seized the domain vb.ly for posting “adult” content. Domain owner Ben Metcalfe disagreed, but the government held firm, and Metcalfe posted a long blog post explaining that the .ly domain should not be considered safe. […]

  12. […] There’s some precedent for the fear: last October, the Libyan government seized the domain vb.ly for posting “adult” content. Domain owners ViIolet Blue and Ben Metcalfe disagreed, but the government held firm, and Metcalfe posted a long blog post explaining that the .ly domain should not be considered safe. […]

  13. […] Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that this isn’t the first problem that those outside of Libya have had with the TLD. Last fall, the Libyan government shut down Vb.ly, the URL shortener run by sex writer violet blue. The domain was yanked because of its content – as it “fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.” […]

  14. […] Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that this isn’t the first problem that those outside of Libya have had with the TLD. Last fall, the Libyan government shut down Vb.ly, the URL shortener run by sex writer violet blue. The domain was yanked because of its content – as it “fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.” […]

  15. […] Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that this isn’t the first problem that those outside of Libya have had with the TLD. Last fall, the Libyan government shut down Vb.ly, the URL shortener run by sex writer violet blue. The domain was yanked because of its content – as it “fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.” […]

  16. […] Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that this isn’t the first problem that those outside of Libya have had with the TLD. Last fall, the Libyan government shut down Vb.ly, the URL shortener run by sex writer violet blue. The domain was yanked because of its content – as it “fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.” […]

  17. […] Obviously when you shorten a link with an .ly service you are not giving your own money directly to Libya – though when Mitt Romney read about my domain being seized, he felt his Mitt.ly was a show of support to Gaddafi and promptly dropped the domain. Other businesses (such as Clip.ly, now Curate.us and Leaf.ly, now redirected) simply changed URLs upon realizing the .ly domain space was simply unsafe. […]

  18. […] Obviously when you shorten a link with an .ly service you are not giving your own money directly to Libya – though when Mitt Romney read about my domain being seized, he felt his Mitt.ly was a show of support to Gaddafi and promptly dropped the domain. other businesses (such as Clip.ly, now Curate.us and Leaf.ly, now redirected) simply changed URLs upon realizing the .ly domain space was simply unsafe. […]

  19. Online trophy store offering engraved crystal awards and plaques with free deep-etch engraving and 5 biz day service nationwide, and more from http://www.diyawards.com/ .

  20. […] The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe >> Ben Metcalfe Blog“The domain was seized by the Libyan domain registry for reasons which seemed to be kept obscure until we escalated the issue. We eventually discovered that the domain has been seized because the content of our website, in their opinion, fell outside of Libyan Islamic/Sharia Law.” Hmmmmm. […]

  21. Quit whining. They own the domain and restrict it as they choose. Quit whining. They own the domain and restrict it as they choose.
  22. […] Libyan law”. The other partner in the vb.ly domain name posted an article titled “The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe“. No […]

  23. bhawant singh bhawant singh
  24. […] believe in free speech. This concern came up for another company using the .ly extension. Vb.ly had their site taken down by the Libyan government because its content violated Islamic law. By registering with a foreign […]

  25. […] believe in free speech. This concern came up for another company using the .ly extension. Vb.ly had their site taken down by the Libyan government because its content violated Islamic law. By registering with a foreign […]

  26. […] Libyan law”. The other partner in the vb.ly domain name posted an article titled “The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe“. No […]

  27. Thanks for providing this information. I think .com and .co.in are safe.In my opinion the NIC did the right job.It has the right to delete any domain which violates the rules.
    —————–
    Johncenanss

  28. Respect,

Comments are closed.