Ben Metcalfe

The Economist on Apple DRM lock-in

Apple iTune’s dirty little (lock-in) secret continues to come out to the fore – this time via “Apples are not the only fruit” – an article in the print edition on The Economist.

Because the music store is only compatible with the iPod, a customer who wants to abandon Apple’s player in favour of something else must replace all the music he downloaded from the store. It is as though a person’s entire record collection worked on only one brand of gramophone. Hence with each song a customer buys, he binds himself a little more tightly to the iPod. Apple offers its customers a “Trojan horse”, according to Mr Shope. Customers embrace its iconic device, and then, like the hapless Trojans, find they have fallen into the hands of the gift-givers.

I’m pleased that the general public are being made more aware of this fundamental flaw with iTunes, and the whole DRM concept. I continue to find people who buy all their music via iTunes but have no idea that they are unable to take that music with them over to a player from a rival manufacturer.

Now, Kevin Marks responds to the article by suggesting:

This thesis is only supportable if you ignore the original feature of iTunes, it’s ability to burn CDs.

Sure, this is true – you can burn the DRM’d music to CD at which point the DRM wrapper is lost and potentially it can be ripped back into standard MP3 or DRM-free AAC format. However there are a few issues:

But despite the “CD burning option” in iTunes, all of this is all a hack. iTunes is not leveraged (anymore) for CD burning, it is about the provision of music wrapped in DRM. As Kevin points out at the end of his blog post:

…don’t buy the videos – you can’t burn them to DVD.

The video-aspect of the iTunes proposition is totally and 100% DRM – with no option to remove the restrictions via burning or otherwise.

It concerns me that the public still don’t know what they are really getting into – and locking themselves into – when they buy DRM’d music and video. I’m glad that articles like the one in The Economist are addressing the lack of information.