<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr/Getty stock deal breaks Creative Commons licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/</link>
	<description>The Virtual Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mollybob</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472924</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472924</guid>
		<description>your point about the CC-NC makes sense to me.  I guess that while it is a good thing to see Getty Images utilisng Flickr in some ways, they still aren&#039;t so good with the community and social aspects of the site. I&#039;m not a good enough photographer to have Getty interested in any of my images, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;d like to change my CC-CN licensing even if they did because it goes against what I consider to be a central part of Flickr, and that is my choice to share my images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your point about the CC-NC makes sense to me.  I guess that while it is a good thing to see Getty Images utilisng Flickr in some ways, they still aren&#8217;t so good with the community and social aspects of the site. I&#8217;m not a good enough photographer to have Getty interested in any of my images, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d like to change my CC-CN licensing even if they did because it goes against what I consider to be a central part of Flickr, and that is my choice to share my images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC Licensing Your Dissertations &#124; Educationload.com</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472878</link>
		<dc:creator>CC Licensing Your Dissertations &#124; Educationload.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472878</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr/Getty stock deal breaks Creative Commons licenses (benmetcalfe.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr/Getty stock deal breaks Creative Commons licenses (benmetcalfe.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jardenberg kommenterar - 2009-01-23 &#124; jardenberg unedited</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472831</link>
		<dc:creator>jardenberg kommenterar - 2009-01-23 &#124; jardenberg unedited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472831</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr/Getty stock deal breaks Creative Commons licenses &#124; :Ben Metcalfe Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr/Getty stock deal breaks Creative Commons licenses | :Ben Metcalfe Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jothie</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472830</link>
		<dc:creator>jothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472830</guid>
		<description>Ha. I&#039;ll sit back and wait for a Getty customer to license exclusive rights to a photo for a national ad campaign or a book cover, and for that same image to be used by a competitor who grabbed it while it was still CC.

I wonder who will be liable for something like that. If the Flickr/Getty contributor contract is anything like the Getty contributor contract, all liability will rest with the contributor should there be a lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. I&#8217;ll sit back and wait for a Getty customer to license exclusive rights to a photo for a national ad campaign or a book cover, and for that same image to be used by a competitor who grabbed it while it was still CC.</p>
<p>I wonder who will be liable for something like that. If the Flickr/Getty contributor contract is anything like the Getty contributor contract, all liability will rest with the contributor should there be a lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472829</guid>
		<description>I am uneasy about Getty teaming up with Flickr based on their current partnership with Israeli company picscout who have been bullying innocent internet users over copyright infringement.

http://commercial-archive.com/content/getty-images-teamed-picscout-hunt-and-destroy-copyright-infringers

Flickr was best when it wasn&#039;t owned by yahoo, wasn&#039;t trying to get into bed with Microsoft and didn&#039;t have this Getty connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am uneasy about Getty teaming up with Flickr based on their current partnership with Israeli company picscout who have been bullying innocent internet users over copyright infringement.</p>
<p><a href="http://commercial-archive.com/content/getty-images-teamed-picscout-hunt-and-destroy-copyright-infringers" rel="nofollow">http://commercial-archive.com/content/getty-images-teamed-picscout-hunt-and-destroy-copyright-infringers</a></p>
<p>Flickr was best when it wasn&#8217;t owned by yahoo, wasn&#8217;t trying to get into bed with Microsoft and didn&#8217;t have this Getty connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Nanabhay</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Nanabhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472828</guid>
		<description>Ben, in principle I agree with you but just a technical point. You can change the license from CC to another license. All it means is that whoever used it previously still maintains the old license. This of course creates a problem if it was share-alike, etc. 

On a slightly related note, we&#039;ve started playing with CC at Al Jazeera : http://cc.aljazeera.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, in principle I agree with you but just a technical point. You can change the license from CC to another license. All it means is that whoever used it previously still maintains the old license. This of course creates a problem if it was share-alike, etc. </p>
<p>On a slightly related note, we&#8217;ve started playing with CC at Al Jazeera : <a href="http://cc.aljazeera.net" rel="nofollow">http://cc.aljazeera.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Roberto</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2009/01/flickr-getty-images-deal-requires-you-to-opt-out-of-creative-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-472827</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/?p=870#comment-472827</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,

Totally agree, they should not be forcing people to remove the CC-licence. 

I think Flickr is totally right though to allow people to change the licence policy attached to their photos. Whilst you&#039;re correct in that CC licences can&#039;t be revoked, there is no onus on the copyright holder to always advertise that fact. For people who accidentally CC-licence their photos, it&#039;s only fair that they can remove that licence and hope no-one notices.

That said, I think there&#039;s an opportunity for a website which scans Flickr for CC-licensed photos and proxies them, so that they&#039;ll always remain available within the commons....

Frankie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>Totally agree, they should not be forcing people to remove the CC-licence. </p>
<p>I think Flickr is totally right though to allow people to change the licence policy attached to their photos. Whilst you&#8217;re correct in that CC licences can&#8217;t be revoked, there is no onus on the copyright holder to always advertise that fact. For people who accidentally CC-licence their photos, it&#8217;s only fair that they can remove that licence and hope no-one notices.</p>
<p>That said, I think there&#8217;s an opportunity for a website which scans Flickr for CC-licensed photos and proxies them, so that they&#8217;ll always remain available within the commons&#8230;.</p>
<p>Frankie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
