<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you pay a voluntary contribution for your BitTorrent usage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/</link>
	<description>The Virtual Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jolt</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-321611</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-321611</guid>
		<description>Paying 50c per downloaded TV show sounds about right to me, if it&#039;s paid only for stuff I watch at least half way through. It would add up to 15 Eur/month if you watch one show daily or 30 Eur/month if you watch two. This is close to what pay TV cost here - but pay TV doesn&#039;t have anything I would want to watch on a daily basis.

The only problem: Using bittorrent is quite illegal here with  more restrictive laws coming up in 2008 which even clearly forbid download-only acquiring of video from unofficial sources.

So currently I pay the things I load and really like by buying the DVD-boxset when it comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying 50c per downloaded TV show sounds about right to me, if it&#8217;s paid only for stuff I watch at least half way through. It would add up to 15 Eur/month if you watch one show daily or 30 Eur/month if you watch two. This is close to what pay TV cost here &#8211; but pay TV doesn&#8217;t have anything I would want to watch on a daily basis.</p>
<p>The only problem: Using bittorrent is quite illegal here with  more restrictive laws coming up in 2008 which even clearly forbid download-only acquiring of video from unofficial sources.</p>
<p>So currently I pay the things I load and really like by buying the DVD-boxset when it comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-321334</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-321334</guid>
		<description>Per download price is not an option for me. 

The way I see it is this: Paying one lump sum per year to access whatever content I want is the way forward.  I don&#039;t spend £200 a year on DVD&#039;s, let alone TV but I would be willing to pay a one lump sum like this to have unlimited access to all TV and (though highly unlikely) movies.  For me the model works as the companies make garanteed money straight up and I also know that I am not going to be paying by the &quot;item&quot;.  This is why Napster works for me, I pay a monthly fee and I have music - since I joined Napster I&#039;ve never once downloaded warez MP3&#039;s, I simply haven&#039;t needed too.

There are two other major problems to consider.  America is ALWAYS ahead on TV and unless they start to distribute AT THE SAME TIME I won&#039;t change my current habits. Additionally the money they make from this avenue would have to compensate for the loss of revenue from distribution channels, e.g. Sky 1 etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per download price is not an option for me. </p>
<p>The way I see it is this: Paying one lump sum per year to access whatever content I want is the way forward.  I don&#8217;t spend £200 a year on DVD&#8217;s, let alone TV but I would be willing to pay a one lump sum like this to have unlimited access to all TV and (though highly unlikely) movies.  For me the model works as the companies make garanteed money straight up and I also know that I am not going to be paying by the &#8220;item&#8221;.  This is why Napster works for me, I pay a monthly fee and I have music &#8211; since I joined Napster I&#8217;ve never once downloaded warez MP3&#8217;s, I simply haven&#8217;t needed too.</p>
<p>There are two other major problems to consider.  America is ALWAYS ahead on TV and unless they start to distribute AT THE SAME TIME I won&#8217;t change my current habits. Additionally the money they make from this avenue would have to compensate for the loss of revenue from distribution channels, e.g. Sky 1 etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamescoops</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-321048</link>
		<dc:creator>jamescoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-321048</guid>
		<description>social pricing wouldnt work if the recipient is a big media Co. rather than a band with a massive cult following (radiohead).  It might work if it was hypothecated for a particular show though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>social pricing wouldnt work if the recipient is a big media Co. rather than a band with a massive cult following (radiohead).  It might work if it was hypothecated for a particular show though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceedee</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-321017</link>
		<dc:creator>ceedee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-321017</guid>
		<description>How about we agree to pay 1c per downloaded show and then another 49c if we think it was worth watching?

Similarly, how many folks will only pay a small amount to download the Radiohead album but then go on to buy the retail box when it&#039;s released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we agree to pay 1c per downloaded show and then another 49c if we think it was worth watching?</p>
<p>Similarly, how many folks will only pay a small amount to download the Radiohead album but then go on to buy the retail box when it&#8217;s released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Scholes</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-320918</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Scholes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-320918</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d prefer to avoid the giant media companies and give the money straight to the creators. I wrote more about it at http://mavhc.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-method-for-making-tv-shows.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer to avoid the giant media companies and give the money straight to the creators. I wrote more about it at <a href="http://mavhc.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-method-for-making-tv-shows.html" rel="nofollow">http://mavhc.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-method-for-making-tv-shows.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/10/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-320880</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/09/would-you-pay-a-voluntary-contribution-for-your-bittorrent-usage/#comment-320880</guid>
		<description>Its a nice idea, I prefer the idea that you pay $x a year and can then download whatever rubbish you wish in what ever format there is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a nice idea, I prefer the idea that you pay $x a year and can then download whatever rubbish you wish in what ever format there is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
