<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When your assets are no longer monetizable: Yahoo! Photos to close</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/</link>
	<description>The Virtual Investor</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: keith jones</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-472525</link>
		<dc:creator>keith jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/05/03/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-472525</guid>
		<description>more yahoo mafia problems here: http://s216606257.websitehome.co.uk/tony.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more yahoo mafia problems here: <a href="http://s216606257.websitehome.co.uk/tony.htm" rel="nofollow">http://s216606257.websitehome.co.uk/tony.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking into the near future - Drive:Activated</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-449020</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking into the near future - Drive:Activated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/05/03/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-449020</guid>
		<description>[...] Or what if the service decides to cease offering the service, like when Yahoo! decided to axe Yahoo! Photos earlier this year? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or what if the service decides to cease offering the service, like when Yahoo! decided to axe Yahoo! Photos earlier this year? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ant</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-217641</link>
		<dc:creator>ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/05/03/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-217641</guid>
		<description>Intriguing news.  I suspect that killing Yahoo photo's will generate far less spume and vitriol than changing the flickr login process (something I vented much spleen upon, and then succumbed to when a nice chap at flickr set me up with a yahoo account - I didn't know him, I'm not digerati or anything, I'm just a user and he went the extra mile).  Perhaps this is Yahoo shedding a layer of corporate skin to re-emerge with far more 'flickryness' in it's 'personality'?  
I do hope that for users of Yahoo photo's it's not to traumatic a process.
I woder also if this is the mergence of the fundamental archive refresh cycle of online storage?  WIth a traditional archive in video for instance, the main weeding cycle was driven by the need to migrate carriers- from U-matic to Betacam for instance. Whenever you migrated carier, you'd prioritise the content and expect to loose the bottom slice (as small as you could afford). Maybe the main cycle driver is now the commercial viability of services, as opposed to the economic viability of carriers.  (N.B.  very little migration is driven by decay- far more is due to increasing costs due to obsolescence).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing news.  I suspect that killing Yahoo photo&#8217;s will generate far less spume and vitriol than changing the flickr login process (something I vented much spleen upon, and then succumbed to when a nice chap at flickr set me up with a yahoo account - I didn&#8217;t know him, I&#8217;m not digerati or anything, I&#8217;m just a user and he went the extra mile).  Perhaps this is Yahoo shedding a layer of corporate skin to re-emerge with far more &#8216;flickryness&#8217; in it&#8217;s &#8216;personality&#8217;?<br />
I do hope that for users of Yahoo photo&#8217;s it&#8217;s not to traumatic a process.<br />
I woder also if this is the mergence of the fundamental archive refresh cycle of online storage?  WIth a traditional archive in video for instance, the main weeding cycle was driven by the need to migrate carriers- from U-matic to Betacam for instance. Whenever you migrated carier, you&#8217;d prioritise the content and expect to loose the bottom slice (as small as you could afford). Maybe the main cycle driver is now the commercial viability of services, as opposed to the economic viability of carriers.  (N.B.  very little migration is driven by decay- far more is due to increasing costs due to obsolescence).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli's Blog</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/05/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-215600</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/05/03/when-your-assets-are-no-longer-monetizable-yahoo-photos-to-close/#comment-215600</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo Spreads the Peanut Butter&lt;/strong&gt;

A key idea in Brad Garlinghouse's Peanut Butter Manifesto was to eliminate redundancy within Yahoo, kill overlapping products that compete with each other.&#160; Yesterday Mr. Peanut-Butter himself, along with Flickr Co-Founder Stewart Butterfield bro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo Spreads the Peanut Butter</strong></p>
<p>A key idea in Brad Garlinghouse&#8217;s Peanut Butter Manifesto was to eliminate redundancy within Yahoo, kill overlapping products that compete with each other.&nbsp; Yesterday Mr. Peanut-Butter himself, along with Flickr Co-Founder Stewart Butterfield bro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
