<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we really want to aggregate *ALL* our social networks together?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/</link>
	<description>The Virtual Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michelle li &#187; Archive &#187; Web Wednesday with Matt Mullenweg</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-473110</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle li &#187; Archive &#187; Web Wednesday with Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-473110</guid>
		<description>[...] separating and aggregating profiles is an interesting area of discussion. Ben Metcalfe sums up his article about this topic by stating that although the most logical thing to do would be to centralize all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] separating and aggregating profiles is an interesting area of discussion. Ben Metcalfe sums up his article about this topic by stating that although the most logical thing to do would be to centralize all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olexiy Prokhorenko</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-472407</link>
		<dc:creator>Olexiy Prokhorenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-472407</guid>
		<description>There is one service - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atomkeep.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Atomkeep.com&lt;/a&gt; - it allows to sync your profile across you favorite social networks or job boards, or even altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one service &#8211; <a href="http://www.atomkeep.com/" rel="nofollow">Atomkeep.com</a> &#8211; it allows to sync your profile across you favorite social networks or job boards, or even altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xmesl</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-472256</link>
		<dc:creator>Xmesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 10:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-472256</guid>
		<description>Please Review This Site, You&#039;ll Like It
[LINK= http://freeaza.110mb.com/ ]lorazepam wikipedia the free encyclopedia[/LINK] &lt;a href=&quot;http://freeaza.110mb.com/ &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lorazepam wikipedia the free encyclopedia&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Review This Site, You&#8217;ll Like It<br />
[LINK= <a href="http://freeaza.110mb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://freeaza.110mb.com/</a> ]lorazepam wikipedia the free encyclopedia[/LINK] <a href="http://freeaza.110mb.com/ " rel="nofollow">lorazepam wikipedia the free encyclopedia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aboutthisboy</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-204682</link>
		<dc:creator>aboutthisboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-204682</guid>
		<description>Dep,
I also agree that it&#039;s a personal choice and I have gone with keeping personal and business seperate. I&#039;m planning on setting up a personal/social portal page which will aggregate all info from Flickr, Last.fm etc, then keep a personal blog elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dep,<br />
I also agree that it&#8217;s a personal choice and I have gone with keeping personal and business seperate. I&#8217;m planning on setting up a personal/social portal page which will aggregate all info from Flickr, Last.fm etc, then keep a personal blog elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dep</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-202087</link>
		<dc:creator>dep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-202087</guid>
		<description>I think having a way to synchronize and aggregate all of our various social networking sites would be awesome...  If theres something you don&#039;t want to aggregate, then don&#039;t aggregate it. The choice is yours.  OR, have a personal aggregated portal for personal things and a business one... Keep them separate. Should be easy to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think having a way to synchronize and aggregate all of our various social networking sites would be awesome&#8230;  If theres something you don&#8217;t want to aggregate, then don&#8217;t aggregate it. The choice is yours.  OR, have a personal aggregated portal for personal things and a business one&#8230; Keep them separate. Should be easy to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaz</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-164390</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-164390</guid>
		<description>Ben: Whilst your points make sense, there is a middle ground here that I think everyone would want. 

At a basic level, as Ted says, the ability to change some basic profile data in one place is useful. There is nothing worse than having to update your email address, msn or whatever at all the different social networking sites  just because some of your friends happen to prefer using one and not the other, or you have multiple personas.

Of course maybe version 2 of such a system would allow you to intelligently manage your identities across different sites so you can have a public and private persona, or even multiple of each! 

To pull something like this off though, a social network API standard is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben: Whilst your points make sense, there is a middle ground here that I think everyone would want. </p>
<p>At a basic level, as Ted says, the ability to change some basic profile data in one place is useful. There is nothing worse than having to update your email address, msn or whatever at all the different social networking sites  just because some of your friends happen to prefer using one and not the other, or you have multiple personas.</p>
<p>Of course maybe version 2 of such a system would allow you to intelligently manage your identities across different sites so you can have a public and private persona, or even multiple of each! </p>
<p>To pull something like this off though, a social network API standard is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-164121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-164121</guid>
		<description>Ben-

It&#039;s a shameless self plug, but even if it were someone else&#039;s project I&#039;d mention it. You just described a lot of the ideas behind FindMeOn.com : every online account listed becomes its own URL + widget + API feed that other services can point to for a data-sync -- and you can explicitly hide / link different online accounts from one another.  The example we&#039;ve been using for the past few months is that you dont want your myspace stalkers to see your family photos, and you don&#039;t want your family to see whats going on in myspace.

Working in tandem with the commercial offering is an open standard node structure at findmeon.org -- which uses public-key cryptography to link + shield online accounts from one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shameless self plug, but even if it were someone else&#8217;s project I&#8217;d mention it. You just described a lot of the ideas behind FindMeOn.com : every online account listed becomes its own URL + widget + API feed that other services can point to for a data-sync &#8212; and you can explicitly hide / link different online accounts from one another.  The example we&#8217;ve been using for the past few months is that you dont want your myspace stalkers to see your family photos, and you don&#8217;t want your family to see whats going on in myspace.</p>
<p>Working in tandem with the commercial offering is an open standard node structure at findmeon.org &#8212; which uses public-key cryptography to link + shield online accounts from one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted R.</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-164108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-164108</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Ben. I think people would prefer to keep the majority of their social account separate.

The one place I do see a convenience would be a single profile source where you can share the basics (optionally to include: name, home town, blog URL, photo URL, dating status, AIM, YIM, flickr,  etc.) 

Then when you join a new network that isn&#039;t too important to you, you can submit your shared profile URL where the new site can suck in your info each on a regular basis. If you get married, or want to show off your new nose ring,  that status or photo is reflected immediately instead of having to change them on each site.

But even this I would see as only a option for social sites you&#039;re not that into, where you aren&#039;t using a photo or name that doesn&#039;t more precisely reflect your association to that topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Ben. I think people would prefer to keep the majority of their social account separate.</p>
<p>The one place I do see a convenience would be a single profile source where you can share the basics (optionally to include: name, home town, blog URL, photo URL, dating status, AIM, YIM, flickr,  etc.) </p>
<p>Then when you join a new network that isn&#8217;t too important to you, you can submit your shared profile URL where the new site can suck in your info each on a regular basis. If you get married, or want to show off your new nose ring,  that status or photo is reflected immediately instead of having to change them on each site.</p>
<p>But even this I would see as only a option for social sites you&#8217;re not that into, where you aren&#8217;t using a photo or name that doesn&#8217;t more precisely reflect your association to that topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-164021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-164021</guid>
		<description>&quot;I continue to wonder whether the majority of social network users really want to see their accounts joined up between the disparate social networks that they use.&quot;

People will have, and use, various identities: the social me, the business me, etc. It would be wrong to smash all those together and that&#039;s not what I&#039;m suggesting. 

I am suggesting that where the attributes of the social me overlap on Flickr and YouTube and elsewhere, I should have the /option/ to consolidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I continue to wonder whether the majority of social network users really want to see their accounts joined up between the disparate social networks that they use.&#8221;</p>
<p>People will have, and use, various identities: the social me, the business me, etc. It would be wrong to smash all those together and that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m suggesting. </p>
<p>I am suggesting that where the attributes of the social me overlap on Flickr and YouTube and elsewhere, I should have the /option/ to consolidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Saad</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2007/02/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/comment-page-1/#comment-163880</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/do-we-really-want-to-aggregate-identiy/#comment-163880</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very interesting way of looking at it -  but I&#039;d probably say that aggregation is more useful for me as a user managing their digital world (i.e. one dashboard to rule them all or one a central place to manage your connections) rather than a way for other participants to see a merged view of my social network identities.

As you suggest - I don&#039;t think exposing all your identities across all your social networks to the &lt;strong&gt;public&lt;/strong&gt; via aggregation is not necessarily a desirable outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very interesting way of looking at it &#8211;  but I&#8217;d probably say that aggregation is more useful for me as a user managing their digital world (i.e. one dashboard to rule them all or one a central place to manage your connections) rather than a way for other participants to see a merged view of my social network identities.</p>
<p>As you suggest &#8211; I don&#8217;t think exposing all your identities across all your social networks to the <strong>public</strong> via aggregation is not necessarily a desirable outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
