Comments on: Why are *we* the bottom feeders? http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/why-are-we-the-bottom-feeders/ The Virtual Investor Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:40:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ian Betteridge http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/why-are-we-the-bottom-feeders/comment-page-1/#comment-31241 Ian Betteridge Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:32:38 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/17/why-are-we-the-bottom-feeders/#comment-31241 "Why de we continue to value the aggregative choices of a few people when the tools to discover a far wider aggregate result are on offer?" Because we like the tastes of those few people. It's the classic editorial process, and no amount of Digg-style voting will ever replace it. “Why de we continue to value the aggregative choices of a few people when the tools to discover a far wider aggregate result are on offer?”

Because we like the tastes of those few people. It’s the classic editorial process, and no amount of Digg-style voting will ever replace it.

]]> By: Frank Ruscica http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/why-are-we-the-bottom-feeders/comment-page-1/#comment-29661 Frank Ruscica Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:18:00 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/17/why-are-we-the-bottom-feeders/#comment-29661 A transparent — and liquid — market for the ad spaces on single-creator media solves the problem, as adbitrageurs will profit from identifying and helping to popularize undervalued blogs… A transparent — and liquid — market for the ad spaces on single-creator media solves the problem, as adbitrageurs will profit from identifying and helping to popularize undervalued blogs…

]]>