<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Every UK postcode given an E-Society rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/</link>
	<description>The Virtual Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in an area that is rated as A : E-unengaged and type A05 : Too old to be bothered. Which makes sense as many of the people are elderly council tenants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in an area that is rated as A : E-unengaged and type A05 : Too old to be bothered. Which makes sense as many of the people are elderly council tenants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27470</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27470</guid>
		<description>I did include the images described above in the last comment, but Wordpress seems to have stripped them out. 

http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Aa.jpg

http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Ab.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did include the images described above in the last comment, but Wordpress seems to have stripped them out. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Aa.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Aa.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Ab.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/image/class/Ab.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27469</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27469</guid>
		<description>I live in the Forth Valley in Scotland and the result for my postcode is very low...  infact, it&#039;s the lowest - Group A: E-unengaged. While many of my neighbours may not know about web 2.0, Flickr or be developing the next killer RoR app I think it&#039;s pretty unfair to label them as &#039;unengaged&#039;.  

Sure, I live in an area that was once dominated by the shipping and mining industries, and large number of the population may be over 40 or retired, but it&#039;s just crass to use an image of an overweight balding man eating chips...



or an ageing pensioner, carrying a polythene bag (no doubt filled with tesco value cheese, the Daily Record and a few tins of Tennents special)



to describe our collective level of e-society literacy. It&#039;s more than crass actually, it&#039;s offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the Forth Valley in Scotland and the result for my postcode is very low&#8230;  infact, it&#8217;s the lowest &#8211; Group A: E-unengaged. While many of my neighbours may not know about web 2.0, Flickr or be developing the next killer RoR app I think it&#8217;s pretty unfair to label them as &#8216;unengaged&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Sure, I live in an area that was once dominated by the shipping and mining industries, and large number of the population may be over 40 or retired, but it&#8217;s just crass to use an image of an overweight balding man eating chips&#8230;</p>
<p>or an ageing pensioner, carrying a polythene bag (no doubt filled with tesco value cheese, the Daily Record and a few tins of Tennents special)</p>
<p>to describe our collective level of e-society literacy. It&#8217;s more than crass actually, it&#8217;s offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Barclay</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27177</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27177</guid>
		<description>Apparently where I live is &quot;We are very sorry but we do not have a classification for the postcode &#039;*hidden*&#039; in our database.&quot;, and the same applies for where I lived on campus while at uni last year.  They have a nice definition of every postcode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently where I live is &#8220;We are very sorry but we do not have a classification for the postcode &#8216;*hidden*&#8217; in our database.&#8221;, and the same applies for where I lived on campus while at uni last year.  They have a nice definition of every postcode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian lansdown</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27170</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian lansdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27170</guid>
		<description>this shows some quite interesting results

For my current house 
TW7 - Group C : Becoming engaged, which is totally correct for my house mates.

My parents 
LE2 - Group F : Instrumental E-users, which is totally correct for them.
Although they found flickr this weekend, they started to use it but I think it freaked them out slightly. 

My flat at uni from September doesn&#039;t even have an entry. I always thought people in Sheffield were slightly behide the times</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shows some quite interesting results</p>
<p>For my current house<br />
TW7 &#8211; Group C : Becoming engaged, which is totally correct for my house mates.</p>
<p>My parents<br />
LE2 &#8211; Group F : Instrumental E-users, which is totally correct for them.<br />
Although they found flickr this weekend, they started to use it but I think it freaked them out slightly. </p>
<p>My flat at uni from September doesn&#8217;t even have an entry. I always thought people in Sheffield were slightly behide the times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27160</guid>
		<description>It does look like that from the results (it just mentions the first part of the postcode).

However that would be very inaccurate -- some of the most poorest illiterate people in the UK and some of the most richest and technically advanced people in the UK live in E2 (my postcode).

Having tested a few postcodes, it&#039;s actually accurate down to the individual postcode.  Just try a postcode and then iterate up...

Or, check out:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/getpostcode.php?postcode=E2+0QB&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;E2 0QB&lt;/a&gt; - A01: E-unengaged/Low technologists, vs
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/getpostcode.php?postcode=E2+9NA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;E2 9NA&lt;/a&gt; - G21: E-business users/Electronic orderers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does look like that from the results (it just mentions the first part of the postcode).</p>
<p>However that would be very inaccurate &#8212; some of the most poorest illiterate people in the UK and some of the most richest and technically advanced people in the UK live in E2 (my postcode).</p>
<p>Having tested a few postcodes, it&#8217;s actually accurate down to the individual postcode.  Just try a postcode and then iterate up&#8230;</p>
<p>Or, check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/getpostcode.php?postcode=E2+0QB" rel="nofollow">E2 0QB</a> &#8211; A01: E-unengaged/Low technologists, vs<br />
<a href="http://www.spatial-literacy.org/esocietyprofiler/getpostcode.php?postcode=E2+9NA" rel="nofollow">E2 9NA</a> &#8211; G21: E-business users/Electronic orderers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Roberto</title>
		<link>http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-27156</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/08/every-uk-postcode-given-an-e-society-rating/#comment-27156</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m &#039;H22 - E-Experts/E-committed&#039; too, which sounds about right for Dulwich.

One correction though - the site only classifies according to the first bit of the postcode (eg SE21), rather than the full postcode, which is a few degrees less granular than you suggest above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m &#8216;H22 &#8211; E-Experts/E-committed&#8217; too, which sounds about right for Dulwich.</p>
<p>One correction though &#8211; the site only classifies according to the first bit of the postcode (eg SE21), rather than the full postcode, which is a few degrees less granular than you suggest above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
