Comments on: CoComment: semantically forked conversation? http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/ The Virtual Investor Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:25:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Plantar Fasciitis http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-473267 Plantar Fasciitis Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:55:05 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-473267 Forgot to say - I enjoy your blog. Thanks Forgot to say – I enjoy your blog. Thanks

]]> By: Plantar Fasciitis http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-473266 Plantar Fasciitis Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:54:05 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-473266 Has co-comment helped in the battle against spam? How have you found it work for you on this blog? Interested to hear your experiences. Has co-comment helped in the battle against spam? How have you found it work for you on this blog?

Interested to hear your experiences.

]]> By: Climb to the Stars (Stephanie Booth) » Diigo — I Think I Like the Idea (Bonus Content: Conversation Fragmentation) http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-472232 Climb to the Stars (Stephanie Booth) » Diigo — I Think I Like the Idea (Bonus Content: Conversation Fragmentation) Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:52:16 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-472232 [...] conversation is now forked or fragmented, something that Ben Metcalfe noted as a problem with coComment, already at the time. I remember that at one point in time, the direction coComment was taking (with groups, mainly) was [...] [...] conversation is now forked or fragmented, something that Ben Metcalfe noted as a problem with coComment, already at the time. I remember that at one point in time, the direction coComment was taking (with groups, mainly) was [...]

]]> By: Stephanie Booth http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-12650 Stephanie Booth Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:06:26 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-12650 It could, but for that we need to be able to link a given blog to a coCo-user account, which we can't do yet. It could, but for that we need to be able to link a given blog to a coCo-user account, which we can’t do yet.

]]> By: iiq374 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-12470 iiq374 Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:26:15 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-12470 Does anyone know if this issue is solved by those blogs that *have* "integrated" coComment? I know that the integration gets rid of the issue of not being able to track non-coComment users comments, but maybe it could also be used to keep the comments in sync? Does anyone know if this issue is solved by those blogs that *have* “integrated” coComment?
I know that the integration gets rid of the issue of not being able to track non-coComment users comments, but maybe it could also be used to keep the comments in sync?

]]> By: Stephanie Booth http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-12420 Stephanie Booth Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:41:31 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-12420 Reading what you say again now, I can imagine that a blog claiming system would solve some of these problems. If a user can be identified as the owner of a blog, then he could be given more power over the comments recorded for it. Some of it could be automated (for example: 'sychronise comments'). Reading what you say again now, I can imagine that a blog claiming system would solve some of these problems. If a user can be identified as the owner of a blog, then he could be given more power over the comments recorded for it. Some of it could be automated (for example: ’sychronise comments’).

]]> By: Laurent http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2344 Laurent Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:47:25 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-2344 We just removed the need for a code to signup to cocomment! Check www.cocomment.com/register We just removed the need for a code to signup to cocomment!
Check http://www.cocomment.com/register

]]> By: Ian Forrester http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2341 Ian Forrester Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:15:48 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-2341 Damm i'm too late again Damm i’m too late again

]]> By: cocofeedback@gmail.com http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2333 cocofeedback@gmail.com Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:01 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-2333 Hi Ben, here some codes for the readers of the blog. First come, fisrt served! 8578-2175-9909 7740-2018-6293 8388-3845-5407 and please do drop by and leave your ideas and feature requests at: http://www.cocomment.com/forum/ warm regards! cocofeedback Hi Ben, here some codes for the readers of the blog. First come, fisrt served!

8578-2175-9909
7740-2018-6293
8388-3845-5407

and please do drop by and leave your ideas and feature requests at:
http://www.cocomment.com/forum/

warm regards!
cocofeedback

]]> By: Joe Anderson http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2006/02/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2264 Joe Anderson Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:27:23 +0000 http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/05/cocomment-semantically-forked-conversation/#comment-2264 I've never thought of it like that before. I’ve never thought of it like that before.

]]>